An introduction into national debt, tax-swap considerations, and stock market performance put into focus.
  • An introduction into the topic of national debt—the key drivers of it and whether it is market-relevant.
  • It’s time for tax-swap considerations. Here’s what it means for fixed income.
  • December seasonality and recent stock market performance are put into focus.

Is the Level of Government Debt a Problem?

Mark Luschini, Chief Investment Strategist

A frequent question from investors is when will the large and growing balance of government debt become a problem? While it is a legitimate concern, we don’t believe it is likely to create a market-relevant event for some time. Indeed, market participants at large have been relatively unperturbed about it for years, helping to keep bond yields near historically low levels.

Background on National Deficit

During the past 15 years, as the U.S. encountered the 2008-2009 Great Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, massive purchases of government bonds by the Federal Reserve reduced the supply available for investors at a time of heightened demand for “safe haven” assets. Meanwhile, inflation was mostly benign until recently, which helped dull the need for higher rates. This has kept service costs associated with the debt at a manageable level and diffused the long-standing concerns about large fiscal deficits. Inflation threatens to push up interest rates, encroach on fixed budgetary obligations, and possibly lower potential growth as the interest paid is diverted from other discretionary or growth-inducing spending programs. While these remain real issues that must someday be addressed, the failure of a crisis to emerge catalyzed by the bloated debt levels has fostered a climate of complacency.

Recent developments in the U.K. warn of what can happen. The announcement of an aggressive program of tax cuts and increased borrowing rattled investors, leading to a sharp drop in the British pound and rise in bond yields. As a result, the government was forced to abruptly change policy and the fallout led to a change in political leadership. This is a fresh illustration of how a large, developed country, one with a much lower debt-to-GDP ratio than the United States, can be disrupted by market vigilantes. One can infer from what transpired in the U.K. that rising deficits and debt do matter, and they can impact market confidence leading to unwelcome and costly turbulence for policymakers and investors alike.

Potential Market Triggers

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), absent any policy changes, the federal budget deficit in the U.S. will average 5% of GDP over the next decade. As a result, the ratio of federal debt to GDP will likely continue to increase. While it is impossible to predict what level of indebtedness will trigger a market reaction, several signs can help to provide a warning:

  • Surging Debt Interest Payments: Threats to our ability to service the debt, therefore causing default, could wreak havoc on bonds and stocks alike. Thus, debt interest payments must be made and if they rise sharply, they can crowd out other forms of government spending, creating political or socioeconomic distress. Certainly, interest rates have risen this year, but it will take time for this to feed through into a significant increase in the average cost of debt financing.
  • A Weakening Dollar: A financial market indictment applied to economic policy typically shows up in the foreign exchange market as investors swap out of what they perceive to be a risky currency. A rapidly falling U.S. dollar would put upward pressure on inflation and interest rates, which might, in turn, dissuade foreign investors from buying our debt for fear that spiraling rates would undermine the value of their holdings.

Lingering Questions

How long can rising debt continue without it devolving in some untoward fashion? In short, probably as long as new debt can be issued at reasonable yields and there are willing buyers. For the time being, we have both.

It is difficult to imagine that politicians or voters will willingly seek fiscal austerity. For politicians, raising taxes and cutting spending has not usually been an electable campaign. And while many voters expect the government to live within its means, few people want higher taxes or the kind of cuts in spending that would make an immediate difference. Ultimately, this means that financial markets may have to impose fiscal discipline and that could be messy. Dating that imposition is a speculative proposition, so for now we will monitor developments without issuing an actionable response to this article’s opening inquiry.

In the January issue of Investment Perspectives, we will share a few ways the nation’s indebtedness can be addressed.

Tax-Loss Harvesting for Bond Investors

Guy LeBas, Chief Fixed Income Strategist

Fixed income markets have delivered negative returns in 2022, as interest rates rose and market values declined. While the performance of individual bonds varies considerably, nearly everything in the U.S. dollar fixed income markets with a maturity greater than one year is worth less today than it was at the end of last year.

Market value declines are certainly frustrating, but at least in some markets it opens up the opportunity to generate tax losses in the final weeks of 2022. Fixed income professionals call that theme “tax-loss harvesting.” Here’s where loss harvesting works in the bond markets—and where it does not.

How it Works for Fixed Income

Chart 1: Muni Market Total Market Value (June 30, 2021 = 0%)

Chart 1 Muni Market Total Market Value

When it comes to financial markets, there’s no such thing as a free lunch, but occasionally if you look hard enough, you can find a few cheap snacks. Tax-loss harvesting in bonds is one such snack.

In simple terms, the idea behind harvesting losses is to sell a bond that is trading at a price lower than its cost basis (i.e., adjusted purchase price), thereby generating a capital loss. To maintain ongoing investment in the bond markets overall, an investor will usually take the proceeds from that sale and reinvest in a similar, though not identical, bond. The new bond will have a lower price and a higher yield. The key part, however, is that our hypothetical investor can then net the realized loss against gains elsewhere in the portfolio, as well as up to $3,000 of ordinary income, thereby reducing tax bills come April.

There are a few important caveats worth noting. First, selling (at a loss) and buying the exact same bond will trigger the IRS’ “wash-sale rule,” and effectively invalidate the realized loss. In order to avoid triggering this rule, the reinvestment should have a different issuer, coupon, and/or maturity date. Note that official IRS guidance is vague on the matter, but any of these changes will ensure that the reinvestment is not “substantially identical” to the sold one. Given that there are usually dozens of bonds with similar characteristics available for purchase at any time, it is typically a relatively straightforward matter to shift reinvestment in that manner. Selling a bond at a tax loss and reinvesting simultaneously is termed a tax swap.

Within the category of tax swaps, there is usually some form of give-up. For example, the swap may require the reinvestment to be a lower-yielding bond or require a slightly riskier bond as a means to match the yield of the bond sold. This give-up in either yield (or quality) is mostly the result of the natural bid/ask spread that dealers require to purchase a bond. One common tradeoff in municipals is to, for example, sell a 5% 10-year bond and reinvest the proceeds in a similar-quality 4% 10-year bond. Since 4% coupon municipal bonds typically trade at higher yields than 5% coupon munis, this swap negates some of the bid/ask spread and “earns” it back with a higher yield.

A Few More Notes About Tax Swaps

Fixed income tax harvesting makes sense with municipal bonds but should be used sparingly with taxable bonds such as corporates. The reason is that, while selling bonds at a loss will generate a tax savings in the current tax year (at capital gains rates), the reinvestment in a similar bond will be at a higher yield, and the forward-looking income (taxed as ordinary income) will overwhelm the tax benefits over time. There are cases when it may make sense, for example, with changing income tax rates, or extreme tax burdens for a single year, but those cases are the exception, not the rule.

There are only a few weeks remaining in 2022 to take advantage of tax swaps and harvest losses for the current tax year. Interest rates are up and bond market values are down just as much, but there’s some silver lining when it comes to IRS bills.

Table 1: Sample Tax Swap 5% Coupon with 8% Market Loss into Similar 4% Coupon

Table 1 - Sample Tax Swap 5_ Coupon with 8_ Market Loss into Similar 4_ Coupon

The Season Might Be the Reason

Gregory M. Drahuschak, Market Strategist

Last month’s Investment Perspectives asked whether there was a fall-back coming for the market in November. Helped immensely by a speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, the S&P 500 answered with one of the best results for the month since 1950.

Chart 2: S&P 500 Best November Results Since 1950

Chart 2 - S&P 500 Best November Results Since 1950

The market’s upside was ignited when Powell said the time for moderating the pace of rate hikes could come as soon as December. Although Powell’s speech was not uniformly dovish, it was enough to send the S&P 500 convincingly above its 200-day moving average on heavy volume. Powell added that given uncertain lags of policy, the full effect of tightening is yet to be felt, which then makes sense to moderate the pace of rate increases.

December’s Stock Seasonality

Table 2: Best and Worst Decembers for S&P 500 Index

Table 2 - Best and Worst Decembers for S&P 500 Index

Entering December, most seasoned investors are well aware of the month’s positive bias as the S&P 500 ended the final month of the year with a gain in 54 of the previous 72 years. The best gain of 11.19% was in 1991. The worst December was in 2018, when the S&P 500 fell 9.18%.

The 1991 market was boosted by a major year-end rally, highlighted by four straight record closes to top off 11 record highs for the Dow Jones Industrial Average that year, as the market benefited from a recovering U.S. economy.

The 2018 loss came as the Dow and S&P 500 recorded their worst December performances since 1931, with all the indices down at least 8.7% for the month on worry that the Federal Reserve might be making a major monetary policy mistake.

Chart 3: S&P 500—All December Results 1950 through 2021

Chart 3 - S&P 500—All December Results 1950 through 2021 - 2

At its low price on Christmas Eve 2018, the S&P 500 was down more than 20% from its record high on an intraday basis before vaulting back in the next session, as the Dow jumped more than 1,000 points on December 26 for what at that time was a record point gain.

Year-End Market Performance

The late-November rally this year that pushed the S&P 500 above its technically significant 200-day moving average might have cleared the way for the index to move toward 4,200, where it would meet significant technical resistance. Reaching this level, however, will require working of a moderate overbought condition created as the S&P moved up more than 15% from its October intraday low.

Taxes always are an issue in December with individual investors adjusting holdings as needed based on their individual tax situation. This process often goes right to the final session of the year.


The information herein is for informative purposes only and in no event should be construed as a representation by us or as an offer to sell, or solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. The factual information given herein is taken from sources that we believe to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by us as to accuracy or completeness. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual investors.

The concepts illustrated here have legal, accounting, and tax implications. Neither Janney Montgomery Scott LLC nor its Financial Advisors give tax, legal, or accounting advice. Please consult with the appropriate professional for advice concerning your particular circumstances. Past performance is not an indication or guarantee of future results. There are no guarantees that any investment or investment strategy will meet its objectives or that an investment can avoid losses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. A client’s investment results are reduced by advisory fees and transaction costs and other expenses.

Employees of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC or its affiliates may, at times, release written or oral commentary, technical analysis or trading strategies that differ from the opinions expressed within. From time to time, Janney Montgomery Scott LLC and/or one or more of its employees may have a position in the securities discussed herein.

About the authors

Mark Luschini

Chief Investment Strategist, President and Chief Investment Officer, Janney Capital Management

Read more from Mark Luschini

Guy LeBas

Director, Custom Fixed Income Solutions

Read more from Guy LeBas

For more information about Janney, please see Janney’s Relationship Summary (Form CRS) on which details all material facts about the scope and terms of our relationship with you and any potential conflicts of interest.

To learn about the professional background, business practices, and conduct of FINRA member firms or their financial professionals, visit FINRA’s BrokerCheck website: