In the latest issue of Investment Perspective, we discuss whether consumers are choosing to save or spend, how the neutral rate of interest serves as a benchmark for investors, and how the cap-weighted S&P 500 compares to equal-weighted.

The Means of Consumption

Mark Luschini, Chief Investment Strategist

Consumption accounts for over two-thirds of U.S. economic activity. Over the years, we have focused on the consumer in many of our reports, reasoning that it offers the best vantage point from which to take a litmus test about the economy’s health. Our conviction that the consumer was in good financial shape drove the bullish take we expressed in our Annual Outlook published at the end of 2023. After all, consumers had a stiff tailwind in the form of job stability, wage growth, and an abundance of excess savings.

Fast forward to today, and the tailwind has lost some of its velocity. Consider, for instance, that households can draw from three income buckets to fund consumption: past income they haven’t yet spent (savings), present income (compensation and investment income), and future income (accessed by borrowing). Past income has been a potent driver of consumption since households began drawing down their excess pandemic savings in earnest at the beginning of 2022. Excess pandemic savings are a finite resource, however, and the most recent analysis produced by the San Francisco Federal Reserve argues that from its peak of more than $2 trillion in late summer of 2021, it is fully depleted at this juncture. If that is the case, then present and/or future income will have to fill the void if consumption growth is going to maintain its current heady pace.

Stuck Above Neutral

Guy LeBas, Chief Fixed Income Strategist

The neutral rate of interest, often referred to as r*, is the theoretical interest rate at which monetary policy is neither stimulative nor restrictive to the economy. In other words, the short-term interest rate is expected to prevail when the economy is at full strength and inflation is stable. For the United States, estimates of r* provide meaningful insight into the proper stance of monetary policy and have significant implications for various financial markets.

In recent years, discussion around r* gained prominence as the Federal Reserve (Fed) embarked on an aggressive rate hike cycle and, in the year since, a period of policy stability. After raising rates by roughly 5% in just over 12 months, Federal officials began to indicate that policy was approaching a “sufficiently restrictive” level. At the same time, measures of inflation receded from 40-year highs, job growth slowed, and recession chatter emerged as a primary topic of conversation among economists. These are precisely the conditions in which estimates of r* are most useful, as they help guide monetary policymakers to an optimal economic outcome.

Is There a Cap to the Gap?

Gregory M. Drahuschak, Market Strategist

The final line of May’s Investment Perspectives said the high for the S&P 500 is still ahead, and indeed it was, as the S&P 500 posted its eighth-best May result since 1950 and set multiple all-time highs along the way.

NVIDIA (NVDA) became the key to sentiment about artificial intelligence. Substantially surpassing the consensus earnings estimate, declaring a 10-1 stock split, and announcing its firstever cash dividend strongly reaffirmed its role in this rapidly evolving technology. This, in turn, added to the Technology sector’s significant performance this year after topping the S&P 500 (SPX) for all of 2023.

 

Continue reading full PDF

The information herein is for informative purposes only and in no event should be construed as a representation by us or as an offer to sell, or solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. The factual information given herein is taken from sources that we believe to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by us as to accuracy or completeness. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual investors.

 

The concepts illustrated here have legal, accounting, and tax implications. Neither Janney Montgomery Scott LLC nor its Financial Advisors give tax, legal, or accounting advice. Please consult with the appropriate professional for advice concerning your particular circumstances. Past performance is not an indication or guarantee of future results. There are no guarantees that any investment or investment strategy will meet its objectives or that an investment can avoid losses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. A client’s investment results are reduced by advisory fees and transaction costs and other expenses.

 

Employees of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC or its affiliates may, at times, release written or oral commentary, technical analysis or trading strategies that differ from the opinions expressed within. From time to time, Janney Montgomery Scott LLC and/or one or more of its employees may have a position in the securities discussed herein.

About the authors

Mark Luschini

Chief Investment Strategist, President and Chief Investment Officer, Janney Capital Management

Read more from Mark Luschini

Guy LeBas

Director, Custom Fixed Income Solutions

Read more from Guy LeBas

For more information about Janney, please see Janney’s Relationship Summary (Form CRS) on www.janney.com/crs which details all material facts about the scope and terms of our relationship with you and any potential conflicts of interest.

To learn about the professional background, business practices, and conduct of FINRA member firms or their financial professionals, visit FINRA’s BrokerCheck website: http://brokercheck.finra.org/