With Republicans winning a majority of seats in the House of Representatives and Democrats holding the edge in the Senate with at least 50 seats and Vice President Kamala Harris as a tiebreaking vote, we will now have two years of divided government.

We have the following thoughts on this change after Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress and the White House for the last two years.

  1. A divided Congress implies gridlock that probably produces the least number of potential compromises and new legislation. Any legislation would have to have broad support by Republicans (to be put on the House floor), 60 votes in the Senate, and Biden’s signature. However, the $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in 2021 and the $280 billion CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 were both passed on a bipartisan basis in the last Congress. Both were deemed critical to the nation’s future and any legislation that does pass would have to be in the same category.
  2. With Republicans in control of the House, future passage of elements of President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda, which included social program spending and tax hikes, seems very unlikely.
  3. Given ongoing geopolitical tensions with China, Russia, and Iran, defense spending is the obvious area for future compromises around potential increases in government outlays.
  4. Other areas of potential compromise include strengthening the supply chain and ending dependence on China, with U.S. manufacturing and cybersecurity potential beneficiaries.
  5. A modest bill making it easier to get a permit for energy infrastructure is incrementally more likely with Republicans in control of the House. This would be beneficial not only for traditional oil and gas companies but also clean energy producers that will ultimately require significant permits.
  6. Democrats were unable to revoke the Trump tax cuts while they had full control of government, though they did impose a corporate minimum tax. Given that they must now share power with Republicans that are strongly averse to raising taxes, future tax hikes face a high hurdle. This should ultimately benefit corporate profitability and earnings growth.
  7. Historical data shows that, on average, the stock market tends to underperform the average annual return during midterm election years, although usually rallying into year end. History also shows overperformance in the subsequent year as uncertainty over policy is lifted, at least temporarily, because the president and the makeup of the new Congress are known. However, history also shows macroeconomic, financial, and geopolitical conditions have a strong influence on any year’s market returns.
  8. Given the current macroeconomic uncertainty, we remain cautious toward stocks and other risk assets. However, we emphasize the importance of sticking with long-term investment plans where stocks continue to play a critical role for maintaining future purchasing power.
This report is provided for informational and educational purposes only and shall in no event be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a recommendation for any strategy or to buy, sell, or hold any product. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual investors. Employees of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC or its affiliates may, at times, release written or oral commentary, technical analysis, or trading strategies that differ from the opinions expressed here. The information described herein is taken from sources which we believe to be reliable, but the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed by us. The opinions expressed herein may be given only such weight as opinions warrant. This Firm, its officers, directors, employees, or members of their families may have positions in the securities mentioned and may make purchases or sales of such securities from time to time in the open market or otherwise and may sell to or buy from customers such securities on a principal basis. This report is the intellectual property of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC (Janney) and may not be reproduced, distributed, or published by any person for any purpose without Janney’s prior written consent. This presentation has been prepared by Janney Investment Strategy Group (ISG) and is to be used for informational purposes only. In no event should it be construed as a solicitation or offer to purchase or sell a security. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance and future returns are not guaranteed. There are risks associated with investing in stocks such as a loss of original capital or a decrease in the value of your investment. For additional information or questions, please consult with your Financial Advisor.

About the author

With Republicans winning a majority of seats in the House of Representatives and Democrats holding the edge in the Senate with at least 50 seats and Vice President Kamala Harris as a tiebreaking vote, we will now have two years of divided government.

We have the following thoughts on this change after Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress and the White House for the last two years.

  1. A divided Congress implies gridlock that probably produces the least number of potential compromises and new legislation. Any legislation would have to have broad support by Republicans (to be put on the House floor), 60 votes in the Senate, and Biden’s signature. However, the $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in 2021 and the $280 billion CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 were both passed on a bipartisan basis in the last Congress. Both were deemed critical to the nation’s future and any legislation that does pass would have to be in the same category.
  2. With Republicans in control of the House, future passage of elements of President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda, which included social program spending and tax hikes, seems very unlikely.
  3. Given ongoing geopolitical tensions with China, Russia, and Iran, defense spending is the obvious area for future compromises around potential increases in government outlays.
  4. Other areas of potential compromise include strengthening the supply chain and ending dependence on China, with U.S. manufacturing and cybersecurity potential beneficiaries.
  5. A modest bill making it easier to get a permit for energy infrastructure is incrementally more likely with Republicans in control of the House. This would be beneficial not only for traditional oil and gas companies but also clean energy producers that will ultimately require significant permits.
  6. Democrats were unable to revoke the Trump tax cuts while they had full control of government, though they did impose a corporate minimum tax. Given that they must now share power with Republicans that are strongly averse to raising taxes, future tax hikes face a high hurdle. This should ultimately benefit corporate profitability and earnings growth.
  7. Historical data shows that, on average, the stock market tends to underperform the average annual return during midterm election years, although usually rallying into year end. History also shows overperformance in the subsequent year as uncertainty over policy is lifted, at least temporarily, because the president and the makeup of the new Congress are known. However, history also shows macroeconomic, financial, and geopolitical conditions have a strong influence on any year’s market returns.
  8. Given the current macroeconomic uncertainty, we remain cautious toward stocks and other risk assets. However, we emphasize the importance of sticking with long-term investment plans where stocks continue to play a critical role for maintaining future purchasing power.
This report is provided for informational and educational purposes only and shall in no event be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a recommendation for any strategy or to buy, sell, or hold any product. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual investors. Employees of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC or its affiliates may, at times, release written or oral commentary, technical analysis, or trading strategies that differ from the opinions expressed here. The information described herein is taken from sources which we believe to be reliable, but the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed by us. The opinions expressed herein may be given only such weight as opinions warrant. This Firm, its officers, directors, employees, or members of their families may have positions in the securities mentioned and may make purchases or sales of such securities from time to time in the open market or otherwise and may sell to or buy from customers such securities on a principal basis. This report is the intellectual property of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC (Janney) and may not be reproduced, distributed, or published by any person for any purpose without Janney’s prior written consent. This presentation has been prepared by Janney Investment Strategy Group (ISG) and is to be used for informational purposes only. In no event should it be construed as a solicitation or offer to purchase or sell a security. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance and future returns are not guaranteed. There are risks associated with investing in stocks such as a loss of original capital or a decrease in the value of your investment. For additional information or questions, please consult with your Financial Advisor.

About the author

Meet our Insights strategists & authors

For more information about Janney, please see Janney’s Relationship Summary (Form CRS) on www.janney.com/crs which details all material facts about the scope and terms of our relationship with you and any potential conflicts of interest.

To learn about the professional background, business practices, and conduct of FINRA member firms or their financial professionals, visit FINRA’s BrokerCheck website: http://brokercheck.finra.org/

;